<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jaczko Goddard LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ga. Appeals Panel Revives Survivors&#8217; Suits Over Courthouse Shooting</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ga-appeals-panel-revives-survivors-suits-over-courthouse-shooting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ga-appeals-panel-revives-survivors-suits-over-courthouse-shooting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ga-appeals-panel-revives-survivors-suits-over-courthouse-shooting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost five years to the day after Brian G. Nichols' murderous rampage at the Fulton County Courthouse, the Georgia Court of Appeals has revived civil suits filed by two surviving staff members of slain Superior Court Judge Rowland W. Barnes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost five years to the day after Brian G. Nichols&#8217; murderous rampage at the Fulton County Courthouse, the Georgia Court of Appeals has revived civil suits filed by two surviving staff members of slain Superior Court Judge Rowland W. Barnes</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446392686&amp;rss=newswire" title="Ga. Appeals Panel Revives Survivors' Suits Over Courthouse Shooting">Ga. Appeals Panel Revives Survivors&#8217; Suits Over Courthouse Shooting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ga-appeals-panel-revives-survivors-suits-over-courthouse-shooting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cohen Milstein and BuckleySandler Feud Over Homebuilder Case</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/cohen-milstein-and-buckleysandler-feud-over-homebuilder-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/cohen-milstein-and-buckleysandler-feud-over-homebuilder-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/cohen-milstein-and-buckleysandler-feud-over-homebuilder-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two mortgage fraud investigations have sparked a spat between high-powered Washington, D.C., law firms. Citing an alleged conflict of interest, BuckleySandler filed a federal suit seeking to bar the Arizona and Nevada AGs from employing Cohen, Milstein, Sellers &#038; Toll to investigate potential mortgage fraud cases against Pulte Homes. Cohen Milstein has demanded that BuckleySandler correct "knowingly false assertions" in its complaint and accused it of engaging in "a disgraceful and intolerable abuse of process."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two mortgage fraud investigations have sparked a spat between high-powered Washington, D.C., law firms. Citing an alleged conflict of interest, BuckleySandler filed a federal suit seeking to bar the Arizona and Nevada AGs from employing Cohen, Milstein, Sellers &#038; Toll to investigate potential mortgage fraud cases against Pulte Homes. Cohen Milstein has demanded that BuckleySandler correct &#8220;knowingly false assertions&#8221; in its complaint and accused it of engaging in &#8220;a disgraceful and intolerable abuse of process.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446386966&amp;rss=newswire" title="Cohen Milstein and BuckleySandler Feud Over Homebuilder Case">Cohen Milstein and BuckleySandler Feud Over Homebuilder Case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/cohen-milstein-and-buckleysandler-feud-over-homebuilder-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Upholds Contempt Sentence for Poison-Pen Letter Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/court-upholds-contempt-sentence-for-poison-pen-letter-writer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/court-upholds-contempt-sentence-for-poison-pen-letter-writer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/court-upholds-contempt-sentence-for-poison-pen-letter-writer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gadfly known for suing judges, police and other officials could spend six months in jail for venting his ire at the city of Paterson, N.J.'s corporation counsel. An appeals court on Tuesday held that Bernard Laufgas was properly sentenced for violating a restraining order meant to protect Susan Champion and other city employees. For 14 years, Laufgas has waged a vendetta against the city and its employees, filing suits and sending intimidating letters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gadfly known for suing judges, police and other officials could spend six months in jail for venting his ire at the city of Paterson, N.J.&#8217;s corporation counsel. An appeals court on Tuesday held that Bernard Laufgas was properly sentenced for violating a restraining order meant to protect Susan Champion and other city employees. For 14 years, Laufgas has waged a vendetta against the city and its employees, filing suits and sending intimidating letters</p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446398477&amp;rss=newswire" title="Court Upholds Contempt Sentence for Poison-Pen Letter Writer">Court Upholds Contempt Sentence for Poison-Pen Letter Writer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/court-upholds-contempt-sentence-for-poison-pen-letter-writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former RRA Attorney Lived Rent-Free in Home Owned by Rothstein</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/former-rra-attorney-lived-rent-free-in-home-owned-by-rothstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/former-rra-attorney-lived-rent-free-in-home-owned-by-rothstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/former-rra-attorney-lived-rent-free-in-home-owned-by-rothstein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defense attorney for disbarred attorney Scott Rothstein said in a deposition that he was paid a $350,000 salary and lived rent-free in a waterfront home owned by his employer. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The defense attorney for disbarred attorney Scott Rothstein said in a deposition that he was paid a $350,000 salary and lived rent-free in a waterfront home owned by his employer. </p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446392293&amp;rss=newswire" title="Former RRA Attorney Lived Rent-Free in Home Owned by Rothstein">Former RRA Attorney Lived Rent-Free in Home Owned by Rothstein</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/former-rra-attorney-lived-rent-free-in-home-owned-by-rothstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Hit With Another Multimillion-Dollar Loss in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/microsoft-hit-with-another-multimillion-dollar-loss-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/microsoft-hit-with-another-multimillion-dollar-loss-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/microsoft-hit-with-another-multimillion-dollar-loss-in-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being hit with a $290 million trial loss last year, Microsoft and decorated patent lawyer Matthew Powers went into the same Texas courtroom with the same judge, against the same Dallas lawyer -- and lost again. The jury concluded late Tuesday that Microsoft willfully infringed on patents held by VirnetX, and awarded the California technology licensing company $105.8 million]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being hit with a $290 million trial loss last year, Microsoft and decorated patent lawyer Matthew Powers went into the same Texas courtroom with the same judge, against the same Dallas lawyer &#8212; and lost again. The jury concluded late Tuesday that Microsoft willfully infringed on patents held by VirnetX, and awarded the California technology licensing company $105.8 million</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446412310&amp;rss=newswire" title="Microsoft Hit With Another Multimillion-Dollar Loss in Texas">Microsoft Hit With Another Multimillion-Dollar Loss in Texas</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/microsoft-hit-with-another-multimillion-dollar-loss-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court Justices, Legal Luminaries Debate Shakespeare&#8217;s &#8216;Henry V&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/high-court-justices-legal-luminaries-debate-shakespeares-henry-v/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/high-court-justices-legal-luminaries-debate-shakespeares-henry-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/high-court-justices-legal-luminaries-debate-shakespeares-henry-v/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William Shakespeare's "Henry V" provided the plot for the Shakespeare Theatre Company's annual mock trial Tuesday night in Washington, D.C., featuring a collection of high-profile judges and lawyers, including Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito Jr. and Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- who was sitting as chief justice for a change. The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Shakespeare&#8217;s &#8220;Henry V&#8221; provided the plot for the Shakespeare Theatre Company&#8217;s annual mock trial Tuesday night in Washington, D.C., featuring a collection of high-profile judges and lawyers, including Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito Jr. and Ruth Bader Ginsburg &#8212; who was sitting as chief justice for a change. The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415.</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446381186&amp;rss=newswire" title="High Court Justices, Legal Luminaries Debate Shakespeare's 'Henry V'">High Court Justices, Legal Luminaries Debate Shakespeare&#8217;s &#8216;Henry V&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/high-court-justices-legal-luminaries-debate-shakespeares-henry-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Finds Plaintiffs Lawyers Defrauded Railroad in Asbestos Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/jury-finds-plaintiffs-lawyers-defrauded-railroad-in-asbestos-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/jury-finds-plaintiffs-lawyers-defrauded-railroad-in-asbestos-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/jury-finds-plaintiffs-lawyers-defrauded-railroad-in-asbestos-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a federal jury returned a verdict against two Mississippi plaintiffs lawyers, finding they had committed fraud against Illinois Central Railroad, it was the culmination of the railroad's seven-year battle against abusive asbestos claims. It also may have been the first civil trial in which attorneys were nailed for fraud in bringing these claims: The jury found the attorneys lied when they denied knowing their clients had previously settled asbestos claims that should have barred them from filing against the railroad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a federal jury returned a verdict against two Mississippi plaintiffs lawyers, finding they had committed fraud against Illinois Central Railroad, it was the culmination of the railroad&#8217;s seven-year battle against abusive asbestos claims. It also may have been the first civil trial in which attorneys were nailed for fraud in bringing these claims: The jury found the attorneys lied when they denied knowing their clients had previously settled asbestos claims that should have barred them from filing against the railroad.</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446401337&amp;rss=newswire" title="Jury Finds Plaintiffs Lawyers Defrauded Railroad in Asbestos Suit">Jury Finds Plaintiffs Lawyers Defrauded Railroad in Asbestos Suit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/jury-finds-plaintiffs-lawyers-defrauded-railroad-in-asbestos-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chadbourne Rescinds Job Offers to 11 Deferred Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/chadbourne-rescinds-job-offers-to-11-deferred-associates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/chadbourne-rescinds-job-offers-to-11-deferred-associates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/chadbourne-rescinds-job-offers-to-11-deferred-associates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chadbourne &#038; Parke confirmed on Wednesday that it had rescinded job offers to 11 incoming associates it had previously deferred past January 2010. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chadbourne &#038; Parke confirmed on Wednesday that it had rescinded job offers to 11 incoming associates it had previously deferred past January 2010. </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446404748&amp;rss=newswire" title="Chadbourne Rescinds Job Offers to 11 Deferred Associates">Chadbourne Rescinds Job Offers to 11 Deferred Associates</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/chadbourne-rescinds-job-offers-to-11-deferred-associates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs Sued for Not Divulging Internal Madoff Ban to Client</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/goldman-sachs-sued-for-not-divulging-internal-madoff-ban-to-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/goldman-sachs-sued-for-not-divulging-internal-madoff-ban-to-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/goldman-sachs-sued-for-not-divulging-internal-madoff-ban-to-client/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Bernard Madoff victim who lost $15 million is suing Goldman Sachs for allegedly failing to tell him in 2004 that he should pull his money out of the Madoff Fund. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Bernard Madoff victim who lost $15 million is suing Goldman Sachs for allegedly failing to tell him in 2004 that he should pull his money out of the Madoff Fund. </p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446397546&amp;rss=newswire" title="Goldman Sachs Sued for Not Divulging Internal Madoff Ban to Client">Goldman Sachs Sued for Not Divulging Internal Madoff Ban to Client</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/goldman-sachs-sued-for-not-divulging-internal-madoff-ban-to-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.Y. City Bar Retracts Survey&#8217;s &#8216;Not Satisfied&#8217; Finding on Deferred Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ny-city-bar-retracts-surveys-not-satisfied-finding-on-deferred-associates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ny-city-bar-retracts-surveys-not-satisfied-finding-on-deferred-associates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ny-city-bar-retracts-surveys-not-satisfied-finding-on-deferred-associates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York City Bar on Wednesday retracted a finding from a survey suggesting that deferred associates were not satisfied with the lawyers with whom they worked at public interest groups. Saying it had misinterpreted data, the bar association also issued a revised report, which claims that deferred associates "were largely happy with their placements," a stark difference from the previous report, which suggested a "culture gap" existed between the law firm-bound lawyers and their public interest colleagues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York City Bar on Wednesday retracted a finding from a survey suggesting that deferred associates were not satisfied with the lawyers with whom they worked at public interest groups. Saying it had misinterpreted data, the bar association also issued a revised report, which claims that deferred associates &#8220;were largely happy with their placements,&#8221; a stark difference from the previous report, which suggested a &#8220;culture gap&#8221; existed between the law firm-bound lawyers and their public interest colleagues.</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446406865&amp;rss=newswire" title="N.Y. City Bar Retracts Survey's 'Not Satisfied' Finding on Deferred Associates">N.Y. City Bar Retracts Survey&#8217;s &#8216;Not Satisfied&#8217; Finding on Deferred Associates</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaczkogoddard.com/2010/03/18/ny-city-bar-retracts-surveys-not-satisfied-finding-on-deferred-associates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
